. . .

Alternatives to Chlorine as a Disinfectant in Drinking Water

EnvironBuzz™ Mag > Online Magazine > LifeStraw > Alternatives to Chlorine as a Disinfectant in Drinking Water
0 0
Read Time:3 Minute, 10 Second

Guaranteeing the microbiological safety of drinking/tap water is of paramount importance all over the world and conventional drinking water treatment has always included the use of chlorine for final disinfection.

In the last few decades, there have been new challenges in water treatment because of the increased presence or emergence of waterborne pathogens like Giardia and Cryptosporidium to which Chlorine has been moderately effective and ineffective respectively. Also, the possible link between halogenated disinfection-by-products (DBPs) caused by chlorination and cancer have impelled many water systems to look for alternatives.

Some of these chemical alternatives are chloramines, ozone, and chlorine dioxide. These chemical alternatives all have their issues. All chloramines and chlorine dioxide still produce DBPs but chloramines produce DBPs at lower concentrations in comparison. In the US, some states saw an increase in lead concentration when the switch was made from chlorine to chloramines. This was found to result from lead leaching into the water from the lead pipes used for water distribution, which was not the case when chlorine was used.  A major concern for ozone is the production of bromates, aldehydes, and ketones in areas where there are high concentrations of bromides and organic compounds in the source water and so depending on water source, pre-treatment to remove bromides and organic compounds may be required.

Non-chemical alternatives include Membrane and UV radiation technologies. Membrane processes can remove bacteria, viruses and protozoa as well as a range of chemical contaminants. They are generally only used on a small scale to ensure effective monitoring. UV radiation is capable of inactivating bacteria and viruses, and possibly protozoan parasites. In both cases, high amount of energy is required.

A few northern European countries, have abandoned final chemical disinfection in many areas, reliance being placed on multiple barriers, often including natural barriers and biological treatment stages, to prevent contamination and to remove or inactivate micro-organisms.

From research, it can be deduced that the development of a successful water system, free of chlorine will require an in-depth understanding of the area to ensure that the best location is selected where natural systems can be used optimally in combination with current technology. According to Fuller, J of Engineering360, the Netherlands may be the most successful to date because chlorine as a disinfectant was last used in the Netherlands in 2005.

Effectiveness of method on Different Pathogens: Microorganism Reduction Ability

Chemical/Non- Chemical optionsE. ColiGiardiaCryptosporidiumViruses
ChlorineVery effectiveModerately effectiveNot effectiveVery effective

 

OzoneVery effectiveVery effectiveVery effectiveVery effective
ChloraminesVery effectiveModerately effectiveNot effectiveModerately effective
Chlorine dioxideVery effectiveModerately effectiveModerately effectiveVery effective
Ultraviolet radiationVery effectiveVery effectiveVery effectiveModerately effective
Membrane processesVery EffectiveVery effectiveVery effectiveVery effective

Table 1: The data on ozone, chloramines, chlorine dioxide , ultraviolet radiation were obtained from Reference No. 4 below

References:

  1. Alternatives to Chemical Disinfection of Drinking Water. Retrieved Oct 3, 2017 – http://www.fwr.org/waterq/dwi0808.htm
  2. Chlorine Substitutes In Water May Have Risks Retrieved Oct 3, 2017 –http://www.npr.org/2011/01/07/132743638/disinfectant-to-clean-water-has-problems-of-its-own
  3. A Water Treatment Alternative to Chlorine? Retrieved Oct 3, 2017 – http://insights.globalspec.com/article/3112/a-water-treatment-alternative-to-chlorine
  4. Chlorine and Alternative Disinfectants Guidance Manual Retrieved Oct 3, 2017 Prepared for Office of Drinking Water Prepared by Earth Tech (Canada) Inc. Mar, 2005 https://www.google.ca/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=16&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwir5aaylNXWAhUJzIMKHfK8DWQQFghwMA8&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.gov.mb.ca%2Fwaterstewardship%2Fodw%2Freg-info%2Fapprovals%2Fodw_chlorine_and_alternative_disinfectants.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3Wn0gIEQh7nL-FlqtVX2j1

About Post Author

Obie Agusiegbe

A Certified Environmental Professional with over 18 years’ experience in the sustainability sector. She works with organizations interested in improving their sustainability performance by assisting them identify and implement ways to include environmental and social aspects into their existing offerings. Her solutions are innovative and can build bridges between other continents and Africa. International Development | Africa | Clean Technologies | Climate Resilience | Humanitarian | Fairness
Happy
Happy
0 %
Sad
Sad
0 %
Excited
Excited
0 %
Sleepy
Sleepy
0 %
Angry
Angry
0 %
Surprise
Surprise
0 %
Previous post Chlorine as a disinfectant in drinking water and its link to Cancer
Next post EnvironFocus Show and Tell – November 25, 2017 – Vendor Promotions – The Green Clean Zone

Average Rating

5 Star
0%
4 Star
0%
3 Star
0%
2 Star
0%
1 Star
0%

5 thoughts on “Alternatives to Chlorine as a Disinfectant in Drinking Water

  1. That is very inteгesting, You’гe an overly professional blogger.
    I have joined ʏour feeⅾ and sit up for in the hunt fοr more of your
    fantastic post. Also, I have shared yoսr web site in my social networks

Leave a Reply

Translate »