Explaining cap and trade via diagram

Cap and Trade: Steering Towards a Sustainable Future

0 0
Read Time:9 Minute, 17 Second

In 2023, hundreds of millions of people around the world experienced extreme heat, and each month from June through December set a global record for the respective month. July was the hottest month ever recorded. Overall, Earth was about 2.5 degrees Fahrenheit (or about 1.4 degrees Celsius) warmer in 2023 than the late 19th-century average, when modern record-keeping began.

Roxana Bardan

Introduction

The Earth’s environmental landscape is at a critical juncture, primarily due to the escalating crisis of greenhouse gas emissions and the resultant climate change. The evidence is overwhelming and irrefutable, painting a grim picture of the planet’s future if immediate and decisive action is not taken. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has underscored the stark reality of climate change, indicating that human activities have been the dominant cause of global warming since the mid-20th century (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2021). The repercussions of this warming manifest through alarming trends. For instance, NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) indicates the rising global temperatures, noting that the past seven years have been the warmest on record, underscoring a persistent upward trend in global temperatures (GISTEMP, 2024).

Cap and Trade

Unlike a tangible product or service, cap and trade is a regulatory framework designed to reduce pollution cost-effectively (Kenton, 2020).

The essence of cap and trade lies in setting a limit (cap) on the total amount of greenhouse gases that can be emitted by factories, power plants, and other installations. Entities under this system are issued emission allowances, which represent the right to emit a specific amount. The total number of allowances is limited by the cap, ensuring that the overall goal of emission reduction is met. What makes this system dynamic and market-driven is the ability of companies to trade these allowances. Companies that reduce their emissions below their allowance can sell their excess allowances to those who find it more difficult to make reductions (Environmental Defense Fund, 2021).

Mechanics of Cap and Trade

Cap and trade is a market-based approach to controlling pollution by providing economic incentives for achieving reductions in the emissions of pollutants.

How Cap and Trade Functions

  1. Setting the Cap: The cap is set by a regulatory authority and represents the total amount of certain greenhouse gases that can be emitted by the facilities covered by the system. This cap is typically reduced over time to decrease the total amount of pollutants released into the atmosphere, encouraging companies to innovate and reduce their emissions (Center for Climate and Energy Solutions, 2021).
  2. Allocating Emission Allowances: Under the cap, companies receive or buy emission allowances, which are essentially permitted to emit a specific amount of greenhouse gases. The total amount of allowances is limited by the cap, ensuring that overall emissions stay within the set limit (Center for Climate and Energy Solutions, 2021).
  3. Trading of Allowances: One of the key features of cap and trade is the ability to buy and sell these allowances. Companies that reduce their emissions can sell their extra allowances to other companies that are struggling to reduce their emissions, thereby incentivizing companies to invest in cleaner technologies and more efficient processes (Center for Climate and Energy Solutions, 2021).
  4. Compliance and Enforcement: Companies must have enough allowances to cover their emissions, ensuring that the total emissions do not exceed the cap. Firms that do not comply face significant fines and penalties, making it less costly to comply with the system than to disregard it (Center for Climate and Energy Solutions, 2021).

The Role of the Market

The market for trading allowances is the linchpin of the cap and trade system. It ensures that emissions are cut where it costs the least to do so. A robust and transparent market, coupled with a stringent cap, can drive innovation and investments in clean energy technologies. The trading aspect of cap and trade provides companies with the flexibility they need to cut emissions most cost-effectively. This market-driven approach ensures that the environmental objective is met in the most economically efficient way possible (Carbon Pricing Leadership Coalition, 2021).

Realizing Environmental Benefits

Cap and trade systems, beyond their primary function of controlling emissions, bring about substantial environmental benefits, transforming the landscape of sustainable development and environmental conservation.

  • Reduction in Greenhouse Gas Emissions: The cornerstone of cap and trade’s environmental benefits is the significant reduction in greenhouse gas emissions. By setting a stringent cap on emissions and lowering it over time, these systems ensure a measurable and predictable reduction in pollutants. Studies and practical implementations of cap and trade have consistently demonstrated its effectiveness in curbing emissions. For instance, the European Union’s Emissions Trading System (EU ETS), the world’s first major carbon market, has been instrumental in reducing the bloc’s emissions substantially since its inception (European Commission, 2021).
  • Improved Air Quality: The reduction in greenhouse gases and other pollutants like sulphur dioxide (SO2) and nitrogen oxides (NOx) directly translates into improved air quality. Regions that have implemented cap and trade have observed significant improvements in air quality, contributing to public health benefits and reduced healthcare costs (Health Affairs, 2021).
  • Economic Advantages and Innovation: Cap and trade not only addresses environmental concerns but also promotes economic efficiency. By allowing the market to identify the least costly ways to reduce emissions, the system minimizes the overall cost of achieving environmental goals. Moreover, it drives innovation, as companies are incentivized to develop and adopt advanced technologies to reduce emissions. The system encourages a shift towards a low-carbon economy, fostering the development of green industries and job creation (International Emissions Trading Association, 2021).

Case Study: California’s Success with Cap and Trade

A prominent example of cap and trade’s environmental benefits can be seen in California’s cap and trade program. The state has witnessed a consistent decline in greenhouse gas emissions since the program’s inception, outpacing the national average in emission reductions. The program has also generated billions in revenue, a portion of which is reinvested in further reducing emissions and supporting communities affected by pollution (California Air Resources Board, 2021).

Addressing Criticisms and Challenges

While cap and trade have been applauded for its environmental and economic benefits, it is not without its criticisms and challenges. Addressing these concerns is crucial for the effectiveness and public acceptance of the system.

Common Criticisms of Cap and Trade

  • Market Manipulation: Critics argue that cap and trade create a market for emissions allowances that can be susceptible to manipulation, potentially leading to price volatility and speculation. Concerns about the fairness and transparency of the trading market are central to this criticism (Kenton, 2020).
  • Environmental Justice Concerns: There are worries that cap and trade allow companies to continue polluting, albeit at a cost, potentially leading to environmental inequities. Communities situated near polluting facilities fear that the system does not adequately address localized environmental and health impacts (Environmental Defense Fund, 2021).
  • Complexity and Bureaucracy: The implementation of cap and trade systems can be complex, involving detailed monitoring, reporting, and verification processes. Critics argue that this complexity can lead to high administrative costs and potential loopholes (Kenton, 2020).

Addressing the Criticisms

  • Ensuring Market Integrity: To address concerns about market manipulation, robust regulatory frameworks and transparent monitoring systems are essential. Organizations like the Environmental Defense Fund advocate for strong market oversight and transparent, accessible market data to prevent manipulation and ensure the integrity of the emissions trading market (Environmental Defense Fund, 2021).
  • Promoting Environmental Justice: To ensure that cap and trade do not disproportionately impact vulnerable communities, policymakers are incorporating measures such as setting aside allowance revenue for impacted communities and establishing complementary policies to address localized pollution (Natural Resources Defense Council, 2021).

Complementarity with Other Environmental Policies

While cap and trade is a powerful tool, it is most effective when part of a broader strategy of complementary policies. Renewable energy standards, energy efficiency programs, and direct regulations on specific pollutants can all work in concert with cap and trade to ensure a comprehensive approach to environmental protection and climate change mitigation.

Conclusion

Cap and trade emerges as not just a policy choice but a pathway to a sustainable future. It’s an invitation for policymakers, industries, and communities to collaborate and innovate, steering the world towards reduced emissions, cleaner air, and a thriving, sustainable economy for generations to come. Encouraging broader adoption and refinement of such policies can be a significant stride towards our collective goal of environmental sustainability and a testament to our commitment to future generations.

References:

Bardan, R. (2024, January 12). NASA analysis confirms 2023 as warmest year on record. NASA. https://www.nasa.gov/news-release/nasa-analysis-confirms-2023-as-warmest-year-on-record/  

California Air Resources Board. (2021). California Cap and Trade. Retrieved from https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/resources/documents/faq-cap-and-trade-program 

Carbon Pricing Leadership Coalition. (2021). Understanding carbon pricing. https://www.carbonpricingleadership.org/what#:~:text=Carbon%20pricing%20is%20an%20approach,of%20emitting%20on%20to%20emitters.  

Center for Climate and Energy Solutions. (2021, August 6). Cap and trade basics. https://www.c2es.org/content/cap-and-trade-basics/  

Environmental Defense Fund. (2021). How Cap and Trade Works. https://www.edf.org/climate/how-cap-and-trade-works  

Environmental Defense Fund. (2021). Addressing Emissions Market Manipulation. Retrieved from https://www.edf.org/climate/addressing-emissions-market-manipulation 

Environmental Protection Agency. (2023, November 14). What Is Emissions Trading?. EPA. https://www.epa.gov/emissions-trading-resources/what-emissions-trading  

European Commission. (2021). The EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS). Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/ets_en

GISTEMP Team, 2024: GISS Surface Temperature Analysis (GISTEMP), version 4. NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies. Dataset accessed 2024-01-19 at https://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/.

Health Affairs. (2021). The Health Benefits of Air Pollution Reduction. Retrieved from https://www.healthaffairs.org/do/10.1377/hpb20200817.253235/full/

International Emissions Trading Association. (2021). How Emissions Trading Works. Retrieved from https://www.ieta.org/page-18192 

IPCC, 2021: Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change[Masson-Delmotte, V., P. Zhai, A. Pirani, S.L. Connors, C. Péan, S. Berger, N. Caud, Y. Chen, L. Goldfarb, M.I. Gomis, M. Huang, K. Leitzell, E. Lonnoy, J.B.R. Matthews, T.K. Maycock, T. Waterfield, O. Yelekçi, R. Yu, and B. Zhou (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, In press, doi:10.1017/9781009157896.

Kenton, W. (2020, December 5). Cap and trade basics: What it is, how it works, pros & cons. Investopedia. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/cap-and-trade.asp  

Lenssen, N., G. Schmidt, J. Hansen, M. Menne, A. Persin, R. Ruedy, and D. Zyss, 2019: Improvements in the GISTEMP uncertainty model. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 124, no. 12, 6307-6326, doi:10.1029/2018JD029522.

Natural Resources Defense Council. (2021). Cap and Trade and Environmental Justice. Retrieved from https://www.nrdc.org/stories/cap-and-trade-and-environmental-justice 

About Post Author

Tia Bigos

Tia Bigos is a 2nd year Environment and Business student studying at the University of Waterloo. This program blends the critical elements of environmental sustainability with the strategic principles of business management, preparing students for the challenges of integrating environmental considerations into business settings. She is on a co-op term working as a Research Assistant for EnvironFocus Inc.
Happy
Happy
0 %
Sad
Sad
0 %
Excited
Excited
0 %
Sleepy
Sleepy
0 %
Angry
Angry
0 %
Surprise
Surprise
0 %

Average Rating

5 Star
0%
4 Star
0%
3 Star
0%
2 Star
0%
1 Star
0%

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *